Life on the FarmAdventures on the Trail
tarheel70
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Name: Eric
Country: United States
State: Florida
Metro: Orlando
Birthday: 8/30/1970
Gender: Male


Interests: Traveling, All Sports, Family, Life with Jesus,
Expertise: Youth Ministry, Acedemic Affairs, Pastoral Ministry.
Occupation: Education/training
Industry: Nonprofit


Message: message meEmail: email me
Website: visit my website


Member Since: 8/11/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
ocmartinez
alexmcmanus
Rymar
my_soul_patch
dawnharshbarger
JamesPetticrew
Nadine_RETRO
Kingdomkatie
jimrogers
simplybridges
Brian_Russell
EricHallett

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Friday, September 28, 2007

Interpretation is everything!!!

I found this article interesting from Islamic Republic News Agency:

Today: Friday September 28, 2007

Jannati: Ahmadinejad revealed US, Israeli lies in NY

Friday Prayer-Tehran-Jannati
Provisional Friday Prayer Leader of Tehran Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati said on Friday that President Ahmadinejad revealed US and Israeli lies during his visit of New York.


Addressing thousands of Tehrani worshipers at Tehran University campus, Jannati further focused on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's attendance at United Nations General Assembly, saying that Ahmadinejad scored another victory during his stay in New York.

This week's Friday preacher of Tehran went on to add in his second sermon, "Ahmadinejad was a star that shone at that assembly." Referring to President Ahmadinejad's presence at Columbia University, he said, "They invite the president, who is the representative of 70 million Iranians, and then begin with a series of swears at him before his address there."
The Secretary of the IRI Constitutional Guardians Council said, The people who do so are academics, not military personnel, or politicians.

"When the academics of a country act this way, what a behavior should we expect their military forces and politicians to have?" Ayatollah Jannati said, "Hurrah Dr. Ahmadinejad who did not lose his temper, did not take revenge by acting similarly, and gave his address modestly, so that the university students attending the meeting kept on applauding him on numerous occasions till the end of the session, which meant pulling the Columbia University Chancellor's leg."
He added, "In accordance with the result of an opinion poll conducted after that meeting, 77% of the students believe President Ahmadinejad was right, and this a a document revealing the US and Israeli media and politicians' lies."
The interim Friday prayer leader of Tehran said, "Dr. Ahmadinejad presented some very valuable information during that session, including his comments that the Columbia University Chancellor's insults were in fact against the students who were present there, because they were wise enough o judge for themselves about the truth, needless of his prejudiced judgment in advance."
Referring to the IRI President's address at the UN General Assembly, the Secretary of Guardians Council said, "Dr. Ahmadinejad impeached the United States."
Ayatollah Jannati added, "The president put under a big question mark the US conduct regarding family foundation and women's rights and warned them on violation of women's rights in the United States, asking them not to act in a way to lead to destroying family foundation and belittling women any more than they already have." He said, "In his address in New York, Dr. Ahmadinejad also posed the questions, 'Why are the dimensions of poverty so vast in your country, and what steps have you taken to assist the poor in the United States?
Why do you tell so much lies, accuse others so baselessly, do not observe the rules of justice, and are not trustworthy at all? Why do you not have any inclination towards God, and speak noting but lies, and accusing the others of charges baselessly?"
Jannati added, "Dr. Ahmadinejad's address at the UN General Assembly was a religious politicians lecture. He spoke like an Islamic preacher, covering both the political and the religious aspects of significant affairs comprehensively."
He added, "He quoted the holy Qur'anic verses and at a land where they do not know God and the Prophet (PBUH), and their main job is cheating and committing crimes, began his address in the name of God, and the Imam of the Time (May Almighty Allah Hasten His Reappearance), and warned the oppressors that they should wait for the wrath of God to engulf them, in accordance with divine verses."
2329/1416

What is your take? Take care.


 

---> Friday Prayer-Tehran-Jannati


Saturday, June 23, 2007

Follow- Up on Healthcare in Canada

This is another article from my home area explaining the situation of Canadian healthcare from a newspaper in Saint John, New Brunswick.   

Private health care at work in Canada

Wellness For a price, patients can jump lengthy public queues for some services at B.C. clinic

Quentin Casey
Telegraph-Journal

As Dr. Mark Godley tells it, the story goes like this.

A few days ago, an eight-year-old child was brought to his medical clinic with a severely fractured arm. The prognosis given at other facilities was a wait of up to three days for treatment, thanks to a backlog of cases.

With their child in obvious pain, the parents decided that was unacceptable.

Enter Dr. Godley and the Vancouver surgical centre he founded in 1999.

The child was quickly seen by an orthopedic surgeon and was back home the next day.

The catch: the parents paid for the service out of their own pocket.

That's because the False Creek Surgical Centre, with its three operating rooms, six recovery beds and emergency room services, is private.

"It's the mom and dad exercising their right as Canadians, as promised by the constitution, to life, liberty and security - and (the ability) to look after and protect their child as best possible," says Godley, a former small town Saskatchewan physician and trained anesthesiologist. "They exercised their right to use this private facility."

It's an arrangement that appears to fly in the face of, at the very least, the spirit of Canada's health system - long trumpeted for its commitment to care regardless of one's wallet size.

Yet the clinic currently operates unfettered, providing numerous private procedures.

On this day, Godley chats quickly on his cell phone, taking a break between patients.

Five back surgeries highlight the day's schedule, booked by patients from across the country - most of them over 65 years old.

For somewhere between $5,000-$10,000 they all skip ahead of the often lengthy public queues.

"The baby boomers are not just going to wait around in pain, and they've got the cash to spend," says Godley. "People are saying, 'I've got choices and I want to exercise those choices'."

For some in New Brunswick, this is a nightmare scenario and one they fear the current government is courting.

Health Minister Mike Murphy has purposely sparked a public debate on the increased role of private sector providers within the health system, as he eyes an autumn release of his revised health plan.

Murphy has emphasized care will remain free, universal and unaffected by one's ability to pay. Yet, he has mulled a variety of ideas: from farming out unused operating room space to private interests, to wondering what services private firms can supply while remaining funded by government revenues.

Despite his vocal opposition to a two-tier system, Murphy's sometimes vague musings have spooked some.

Recently, the New Brunswick Union, which represents 2,500 health care professionals, cried out in a press release , "The illusion being created is (that) the private sector has a magic pill which suddenly makes all the problems go away. If you need an example of how the 'pay as you go' system does not work, then simply look to the United States.

"The private sector has no advantage over the expertise and experience of the professionals in our public system," it continued.

Such apprehension is not shared by everyone. A recent Telegraph-Journal poll showed that sixty-five per cent of New Brunswickers support private companies offering health services, provided they are paid for by the government.

Still, such fears appear at least slightly justified by the presence of Godley's clinic on Canadian soil.

Could Murphy's musings for fixing the public system lead to the propagation of private clinics and the destruction of medicare?

It doubtful, but the existence of False Creek leaves some hesitation.

Experts agree its services oppose the Canada Health Act, the country's health insurance legislation.

"Patients are being asked to pay directly for a service that is, in fact, covered under the provincial plan. That makes it a violation of the Act," says John Church at the Centre for Health Promotion Studies at the University of Alberta.

"That is the only thing the Act deals with, and the only thing it has ever dealt with - whether or not patients are being charged fees at the point of service."

But for Godley, the debate hardly stops there.

"The Canada Health Act is a nice, ideological, virtuous piece of legislation"¦ (but) it doesn't work. What you've ended up with is a system that has rationed care and people on wait lists," he said.

"It's not right, and in a sense spiteful, to say that someone who has worked very hard all their life, and has contributed in taxes and has been a good citizen, cannot then use their after tax dollars to look after their own health.

"It comes down to that basic human right to look after and protect your own being.

"We need to have a free market, competitive economy"¦ in our health care system."

According to Godley, False Creek is in full compliance because its doctors are not enrolled in the provincial system, meaning they need not abide by the provincial structure.

Many of the more than 40 specialists and five emergency room doctors who rotate through the clinic are from other provinces.

The British Columbia Ministry of Health does not dispute that logic.

As long as the physicians are not part of the Medical Services Plan (the province's public health insurance), they are outside the bounds of the Canada Health Act, officials say.

With that arrangement, False Creek can legally perform surgeries for foreign patients and even those from other provinces, in addition to cases involving the RCMP and workers' compensation.

The only sticking point comes when an actual B.C. resident is involved.

"Someone from another province coming in would not violate the Act," says Sarah Plank, a spokeswoman with the ministry.

"If they're medically necessary services provided to (local residents), then that is a contravention (of the Act)."

And it appears someone has caught on.

According to Plank, the Medical Services Commission, the province's body for governing the public health insurance plan, is looking into the activities of the clinic because of public complaints.

It's now unclear how that investigation will affect the clinic, which has in the past closed its doors and re-jigged its set-up to navigate within the Act.

In the meantime, Godley is unapologetic and quick to justify the need for such facilities. By his count there are about 15 other private facilities in his province that offer surgical services, such as in workers' compensation cases.

"These centres have basically sprung up all over the place," he says, estimating that 60,000 operations are performed each year as a result.

"That's 60,000 extra surgeries that are being done in the health care system in B.C. every year. If you were to take that away, let's just say with some ludicrous legislation that outlaws private facilities, all of those surgeries would have to be reabsorbed into the public system.

"You can imagine the waiting lists then. So clearly there is a role to play."

Roughly half of Godley's patients are private citizens paying with their own funds. Many are now from Alberta, where advertising has produced what Godley calls a steady stream of work. He says an eye to the New Brunswick market may not be far off.

The target is clear: Canadians with disposable income who are waiting weeks and months for surgery.

"British Columbia is a perfect example of how the private sector is involved in the overall increase in capacity of health care delivery," he says. "It's about capacity. You can't think about it as private versus public, but rather the overall delivery of health."

Back at the University of Alberta, John Church says there are concrete examples of provinces using private providers to trim public lineups.

Take his province where for years the government has contracted out hip and knee replacements to private providers. The difference is that the procedures remain publicly funded and strictly regulated, he said.

Yet even that arrangement has the undesirable potential to weaken medicare by drawing doctors, nurses and other resources away from the public sector, he notes.

That's a concern if False Creek copycats sprout up across the country.

"I think it is likely to become more of an issue," Church said.

"I would say that the federal and provincial governments are not actively policing the activities of health service providers. It's really up to members of the public to bring it to the attention of the government.

"If in British Columbia there is a significant public outcry against these sorts of things, then government will likely be motivated to do something about it," he said. "If not, presumably the public is OK with this."

Advertisement
var zflag_nid="719"; var zflag_cid="64/39"; var zflag_sid="2"; var zflag_width="160"; var zflag_height="600"; var zflag_sz="7"; if(typeof kwd == 'undefined')kwd=''; var zflag_kw=kwd;


Friday, June 22, 2007

Myth of Universal Health Care.

First of all I want you to know that I am a Canadian and would like to see some form of Universal Health Care for the United States. I also want you to know that I have not seen Michael Moore's new documentary "Sicko". However I am a son and a son inlaw of two senior citizens that the Canadian Healthcare is failing and continues to fail. (One person is middle class, the other is rural poor.) I watch in one area in which 8000 residents have no doctor so the medical system will do nothing for them. In another case I watch a person go without surgery on their knee because the wait for surgery would be three years. (The doctor's in Canada actually told the person  to go to Boston for surgery if they wanted it sooner.) When I read the LA times article about the situation that US citizen's are facing, I thought to myself this sounds like Canada. The only thing worse is that Canadians are taxed for a myth and US citizens are not. My thoughts on this subject are that we need to be very careful about the proposals and make sure we are asking the right questions: How is on time care defined? one hour, one week, one year? Have you heard of patients dying in line for care? (Check out the socialized systems.) One of my relatives friends is waiting to have heart bypass surgery, been waiting for eight months. (Ticking time bomb) What is paid for? Who decides the costs of the procedures? Do the Doctors have ownership in the system or is it the beaucrates in Washington? These are all important questions to be answered on a very difficult issue. I would like to see the possibility of a person having coverage for ER and catastrophic care provided by our tax dollars, however I think it needs to be a combination of private and public providers. It is interesting to me that rich person's in Canada go to the United States for surgeries not because the care or the Doctor's are better but simply to jump the line and have their health issue resolved. Sadly in Canada it is the poor that are punished because they wait and wait and the care will come but often later rather than sooner. Usually much to late and instead of healthcare you have "sickcare". Just some thoughts on a difficult subject and one that I know will be lighting up the political debates this fall and through all of next year. Let me know your thoughts?     

'Sicko' leaves top Democrats ill at ease

Leading candidates are sidestepping direct comment on filmmaker Michael Moore's proposals for universal healthcare.
By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Times Staff Writer
June 22, 2007

WASHINGTON — With the release of Michael Moore's "Sicko," a movie once again is adding sizzle to an issue that's a high priority for liberal politicians — this time comprehensive health insurance for all. But unlike Al Gore's film on global warming, which helped rally support on an equally controversial problem, "Sicko" is creating an awkward situation for the leading Democratic presidential candidates.

Rejecting Moore's prescription on healthcare could alienate liberal activists, who will play a big role in choosing the party's next standard-bearer. However, his proposal — wiping out private health insurance and replacing it with a massive federal program — could be political poison with the larger electorate.

At a special screening in Washington this week, politicians, lobbyists, media pooh-bahs and policy junkies flocked to see Moore's film. And its slashing demand for action on an issue that voters care deeply about, and Democrats hope to capitalize on, generated plenty of buzz. Moore hopes that, after its general release June 29, "Sicko" will exert significant influence on the presidential campaign.

Instead of greeting the film with hosannas or challenging it head-on, however, the leading Democratic presidential candidates have sidestepped direct comment on Moore's proposals.

Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of South Carolina all have staked out positions sharply at odds with Moore's approach. But none of them is eager to have that fact dragged into the spotlight.

If Moore's fire-breathing proposal catches on among party activists, who tend to be suspicious of the private sector and supportive of direct government action, the candidates' pragmatic, consensus-seeking ideas could look like weak-kneed temporizing — much the way their rejection of an immediate pullout from Iraq has drawn heated criticism from antiwar activists.

In "Sicko," the filmmaker calls for abolishing the insurance industry, putting a tight regulatory collar on pharmaceutical companies and embracing a Canadian-style government-run system.

Advocacy groups are already planning to use the film to pressure the Democratic hopefuls.

"The candidates haven't sensed the political fever in this country that fundamental change is called for in the healthcare system," said Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Assn. "What we are going to do is call on the candidates to reconsider their positions."

Stoking the passions of rank-and-file Democrats for a government takeover of the healthcare system amounts to political folly, respond some liberal veterans of Washington's healthcare battles.

"To presume that the private sector is going to sit idly by to see the destruction of private coverage I think is a misreading of reality," said Ron Pollack of the advocacy group Families USA. "I think the presidential candidates understand that if healthcare reform is going to have a chance of success, it will require bipartisanship and a balance of public and private coverage. It cannot be the triumph of one ideology over the other."

Such a blending increasingly seems to be taking place in major federal and state programs, including Medicaid, the State Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicare. As employer-sponsored health insurance shrinks, insurance companies have reinvented themselves as managers and middlemen for government programs, said UC Berkeley health economist James Robinson.

For example, more than 60% of Americans enrolled in Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor, are now in some form of managed care, compared with fewer than 25% in the mid-1990s. In California, Medicaid is known as Medi-Cal.

"Whatever mix of private and public sources will increase the number of people with coverage, the insurance companies would like it to be managed by them," Robinson said in a recent interview. "They can work with Medicare, they can work with Medicaid, they can work with employers, they can work with whomever."

There's little room for such nuanced partnerships in "Sicko." If there's a villain in the movie, "the villain is called the health insurance industry of America," Moore told a Capitol Hill rally Wednesday. To laughter and applause, Moore said he hoped the film would turn into a "going-away present" for industry lobbyists.

"Sicko" uses the wrenching stories of individual Americans to compare some of the worst failings of this country's system with a rosy perspective on healthcare in Canada, Britain, France and even Cuba — a country that offers healthcare for all but also imprisoned a doctor in the late 1990s for speaking out against government failure to respond to an epidemic of a mosquito-borne virus.

Moore investigates the dumping of hospital patients on skid row in Los Angeles. He tells the story of a middle-class couple from Colorado who lost their home and had to move in with their adult children because of medical bills, even though they had insurance. A particularly sobering episode involves a Missouri family in which the father is denied a medical procedure that might have saved him from cancer.

Filmgoers also meet an uninsured American who accidentally sawed off two of his fingertips and had to choose which one to have reattached, because he couldn't afford to do both. Moore juxtaposes that story with that of a young man in Canada who lost five fingers in an accident and had them all reattached — without having to pay.

"It's quite effective, [but] it's not a documentary," Robert D. Reischauer, one of Washington's leading health policy experts and a supporter of coverage for all, said after viewing the movie.

"Policy propaganda," he called it.

For most Democratic presidential candidates (Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio advocates a government single-payer program), it's more like a headache.

--


Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Gender Genocide

Hey Everyone,

I wanted you to be able to read this troubling article that just came across the news. It makes me wonder about the UN Population policies and if they are really working. It seems to me like it has lead to some serious and troubling situations. Read the articles and let me know what you think? I am sorry for the heavy and depressing news item but we cannot ignore this situation. I wonder how much news coverage this will receive. Try to comprehend the number 60 Million. I can't, can you? That is a little less than double the population of my home country Canada, within 25-30 years gone. Can you imagine a country with no people? It makes me ache all over for a world that does not value life. Be a voice of hope today, the world needs it now more than ever.

Eric.        

 

Infanticide, Abortion Responsible for 60 Million Girls Missing in Asia

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

By Sherry Karabin

FC1

ADVERTISEMENT get_a(300,250,"frame1");

There is a little-known battle for survival going in some parts of the world. Those at risk are baby girls, and the casualties are in the millions each year. The weapons being used against them are prenatal sex selection, abortion and female infanticide — the systematic killing of girls soon after they are born.

According to a recent United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) State of the World Population Report, these practices, combined with neglect, have resulted in at least 60 million "missing" girls in Asia, creating gender imbalances and other serious problems that experts say will have far reaching consequences for years to come.

"Twenty-five million men in China currently can’t find brides because there is a shortage of women," said Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute in Washington, D.C. "The young men emigrate overseas to find brides."

The imbalances are also giving rise to a commercial sex trade; the 2005 report states that up to 800,000 people being trafficked across borders each year, and as many as 80 percent are women and girls, most of whom are exploited.

Click here for FOXNews.com's Asia center.

"Women are trafficked from North Korea, Burma and Vietnam and sold into sexual slavery or to the highest bidder," Mosher said.

State-Sanctioned Infanticide?

Mosher, the first American social scientist allowed into China, puts much of the blame on Beijing's one-child policy, which took effect in 1979.

The policy encourages late marrying and late childbearing, and it limits the majority of urban couples to having one child and most of those living in rural areas to two. Female infanticide was the result, he said.

"Historically infanticide was something that was practiced in poor places in China," Mosher said. "But when the one-child policy came into effect we began to see in the wealthy areas of China, what had never been done before in history — the killing of little girls."

In recent years, female infanticide has taken a back seat to sex-selective abortion or female feticide, due to the advent of amniocentesis and ultrasound technology as well as other prenatal sex selection techniques, many of which are now readily available in clinics and doctors’ offices.

"We feel it's a serious problem that everybody should be concerned about and aware of," said Wanda Franz, president of the National Right to Life Committee. "This is a form of abortion that, from our point of view is especially egregious. Abortion is claimed to help women; obviously in these cases, females are the direct victims, because women in these cultures are not valued.

"In our family we adopted a Chinese baby," she continued. "There have been thousands and thousands of them adopted since China’s one-child policy created this overabundance of baby girls in orphanages."

How bad are the imbalances between males and females in Asia?

Generally, the normal sex ratio at birth (SRB) is between 103 and 105 males per 100 females, and in rare cases 106 or a bit more than that.

Countries that are known to have or have had higher sex ratio at birth numbers include South Korea, which peaked at 115 in 1994, Singapore where the SRB registered 109 in 1984 and China, which has seen the numbers increase over the past two decades.

Published reports in China show the gender ratio for newborns in 2005 was 118 boys for every 100 girls, and in some southern regions like Guangdong and Hainan, the number has reached 130 boys for every 100 girls.

The 2000 Chinese census put the average sex ratio at 117, with Tibet having the lowest number at 103 and Hainan registering the highest at 136.

Nicholas Eberstadt, a researcher at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research in Washington, D.C., attributes the large sex-ratio imbalances in places like China to a combination of factors: an enormous and enduring preference for boys reinforced by the low socioeconomic status accorded to women; the use of rapidly spreading prenatal sex determination technology for gender-based abortion; and the rapid drop in fertility in different populations, making the outcome of each birth even more important.

"The one-child policy intensifies this problem, but if that policy stops and fertility levels stay at one or two, the problem won’t entirely go away," Eberstadt said. "When the average number is down to one or two, there is an incentive for parents to meddle with the outcome. In places where fertility levels are high, there are few signs of sex selection."

In his presentation before the World Youth Alliance in New York City last April, Eberstadt warned that "The Global War Against Baby Girls" is expanding.

"There are gender imbalances in almost every East Asian country, but Japan," said Eberstadt, who has also noted alarming irregularities in Western Asia in places like Cyprus, Qatar and Pakistan, as well as in some countries on the African continent, including Egypt, Libya and Tunisia.

Indian Girls Bear Dowry Burden

In India, where the child sex ratio is calculated as the number of girls per 1,000 boys in the 0-6 years age group, the problem is severe. The 2001 Census shows there are only 927 girls per 1,000 boys, representing a sharp decline from 1961 when that number was 976. In certain parts of the country there are now fewer than 800 girls for every 1,000 boys.

"India is a very mixed bag," Eberstadt said. "In some parts there are no signs of any unnatural imbalances; in other parts the numbers are grotesque."

For instance, 2001 census reports show that Punjab and Haryana reported fewer than 900 girls per 1,000 boys.

"The problem is more prevalent in the northern and western states, where prosperity, rapid fertility decline and patriarchal (male heads the family) mindsets combine to put girls at risk," said Ena Singh, the assistant representative at UNFPA.

Like China, there is a strong son preference for various socio-economic reasons, such as the son being responsible for carrying on the family name and support in old age. Furthermore, in some sections of India it is believed that only sons can perform the last rites for parents.

In addition to sharing a strong son preference, both India and China lack a national social-security system. As it is assumed that a daughter will become a part of her husband’s family, parents must rely on their sons to take care of them.

Since the 1970s, India’s government has promoted a two-child family as "ideal." While no formal laws exist, the general fertility decline in the country has led to smaller families, with couples still preferring to have at least one son. But the government has done more than just suggest this number.

"In India it has been done state by state, village by village," Mosher said. "There have sterilization campaigns and there is enormous pressure. Villages that won’t comply have been denied fertilizer, access to irrigation water, etc."

Complicating matters even further in India is the dowry system, where families pay large sums in order to marry off their daughters. Although prohibited in 1961, newspaper reports illustrate the continuing phenomenon. This can be very expensive for families, adding to the perception that girls can be a financial burden.

Abortion is legal in India under certain conditions, but sex-selective abortions or female feticide is a crime.

In 1994, the government enacted the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Act (PC & PNDT), which prohibited those conducting such tests from telling or otherwise communicating to the woman or her family the sex of the fetus. The law was amended in 2003 to prohibit sex selection before or after conception.

"In recent years, prenatal sex selection and female feticide in India has increased," Singh said. "Though it is against the law for ultrasound technologies to be used to detect the sex of the child, it is still done illegally."

In 2006 a doctor and his assistant in the northern state of Haryana were sentenced to two years in jail and fined for revealing the sex of a female fetus and agreeing to abort it. It was the first time medical professionals were sentenced to jail time under the (PC & PNDT) Act. Three years earlier, a doctor in Punjab received a fine. Singh estimates that hundreds more cases are being investigated across the country and taken to court.

Experts who have analyzed the National Family Health Survey 2 (NFHS2) estimate that about 300,000 girls go "missing" in India each year. Other studies have put the number between 150,000 and 500,000.

While many people see this as a problem of the poor, analysts say it is more prevalent among those in the wealthier and educated segments of society.

Men in parts of India are also beginning to have difficulties finding brides, causing some to leave the country to do so.

"Hindu girls are being smuggled and purchased from poor countries like Nepal and Bhutan to be brides for Indian men," said Bernard Dickens, professor emeritus of health law and policy at the University of Toronto Law School.

Combating the Problem

In recent years various Indian state governments and media houses have launched initiatives to address the gender imbalances, including "Save the Girl Child" campaigns.

Last February, the Indian government announced its "cradle scheme," whereby orphanages would be set up to raise unwanted baby girls. Other incentives include tax rebates on ownership of properties and reserving seats for female candidates in villages, districts and at municipal levels.

Community groups, corporations and individuals have also started various efforts to enhance the status of the girl child. In March 2007, politician Sonia Gandhi, chairwoman of the United Progressive Alliance, spoke out against female feticide and the need for gender equality at the at the International Women’s Day celebrations in New Delhi.

Lara Dutta, UNFPA’s goodwill ambassador, a popular actress and Miss Universe 2000, has also been working extensively with young people to raise awareness about the issue.

China too has enacted laws in an effort to meet its goal of lowering the sex ratio at birth to normal levels by 2010.

In 1994, the Mother and Child Health Law of the Peoples Republic of China outlawed the practice of sex identification of the fetus and sex-selective abortions without medical requirements. This was reaffirmed in the 2002 Population and Family Planning Law.

Officials also started the "Care for Girls" campaign to promote equality for men and women and economic support is being offered to girl-only families in the countryside.

"Raising awareness is important," said William Ryan, a Asia and Pacific regional information advisor for the United Nations Population Fund. "I think the effort to emphasize equality of the sexes and the value of women in society will help reduce the problem in the long run."

China Holds On to One Child

However, China has pledged to keep its one-child policy in place until the year 2050, a policy which it admits is "related" to the large sex imbalances in the country.

"The implications are potentially disastrous," Mosher said. "The answer is economic development, not restricting the number of people."

This year, the United States sponsored a resolution at the U.N.’s Commission on the Status of Women that called for eliminating infanticide and gender selection. The resolution was withdrawn due to opposition from several countries, including China and India; however, the issue of prenatal sex selection was included in the final conference document.

Interestingly South Korea was one of the countries to support the resolution. Like China and India, it too has had its own problems with sex imbalances; however, progress is being made.

If the imbalances continue, Adam Jones, executive director of Gendercide Watch, sees another possible outcome.

"Because of the disparity, surviving women have greater market value," he said. "As a result, it may become more economically viable for families to have girl children, thus reducing rates of female infanticide and sex selection."

As China and India work toward solving their problems, Eberstadt points out that three large European countries are also showing disturbing signs.

"Greece, Macedonia and Yugoslavia betray some hints of prejudicial death rates for little girls in the post-war period," he said. While the numbers are very small, he notes they are "nonetheless curious and unusual.

"In the western hemisphere, Venezuela and El Salvador both have unnatural death rates for little girls and now also display unnatural sex ratios at birth," he continued.

Published reports point to problems among some immigrant groups in Canada as well. And even in the United States, Eberstadt said, some Asian-American populations have begun to "exhibit sex ratios at birth that could be considered biologically impossible."

"Since the mid-1990s, the issue of female infanticide and sex selection has been highlighted in several conferences and in several U.N. documents," said Samantha Singson, chief U.N. liaison for the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. "Unfortunately the issue isn’t getting as much attention as we feel it deserves."

Click here for FOXNews.com's Asia center.


Tuesday, June 05, 2007

Asleep for Nineteen Years

Hey Everyone,

I have been in Canada the last week and am now back in Florida and able to post again. I ran across this article in the German Newspaper "Spiegel Online". For some of us we might think it would be nice to sleep for 19 years but I am still trying to think about what it would be like to wake up after 19 years. This is a mind boggling story. Imagine what life would be like for you or me? This is also a tremendous story of love, patience, faith and kindness. Could you wait nineteen years for the person you love to wake up? Gertruda had tremendous belief and commitment to stay with her husband. Some major changes happened around Jan but not his wifes love. Wow. Take a read and let me know your thoughts.

Be blessed,

Eric. 

The Man Who Slept for Two Decades

Polish railway worker Jan Grzebski has awoken from a 19-year coma into a world that has transformed itself from Communist food queues to Big Macs and mobile phones. The story is reminiscent of the movie 'Goodbye Lenin.'

Jan Grzebski with his devoted wife Gertruda.
Zoom
DPA

Jan Grzebski with his devoted wife Gertruda.

Polish railway worker Jan Grzebski fell into a coma after being knocked over by a railcar in 1988 -- one year before the fall of Communisim. His doctors didn't give him long to live.

They were wrong. While machines kept him alive, Socialist Poland died outside on the streets. He didn't see the fences and walls come down, missed the collapse and subsequent rebirth of Poland's economy, as well as the country joining NATO and then the European Union.

He awoke on April 12 of this year to a world of democracy and consumerism after spending 19 years in the selfless and devoted care of his wife Gertruda.

"When I went into a coma there was only tea and vinegar in the shops, meat was rationed and huge petrol queues were everywhere," Grzebski, still wheelchair-bound, told Polish media in interviews broadcast on Saturday.

"There are so many goods in the shops it makes my head spin."

Gertruda had refused to believe the doctors who said he would never regain consciousness. "He couldn't move his legs or hands, he couldn't hold up his head," she told the TVN24 channel. "He was a living corpse."

But she could sense his will to live. "I always got angry when someone said people like him should get euthanasia. I had faith that Jan would recover." She noticed last year that her husband started trying to speak. He was taken back to hospital and awoke from his coma two months ago.

"His speech wasn't clear at first, now it's improving day by day," said Grzebski's doctor Wojciech Pstragoswki. "He can move his feet now, the feeling has returned to his limbs and he can hold light objects. I'm sure the patient wouldn't have reached this good condition without the devotion of his wife."

"It was Gertruda who saved me, and I'll never forget it," said Grzebski, now getting to know his family which has grown considerably since his accident. His four children are all married and have provided him with 11 grandchildren.

"What amazes me today is all these people who walk around with their mobile phones and never stop moaning," said Mr Grzebski. "I've got nothing to complain about."

The case evokes the 2003 German hit movie "Goodbye Lenin" in which an East Berlin woman goes into a coma before the fall of the Berlin Wall. She awakes after it has come down, and her son shields his weakened, bed-ridden mother from the shock of how history has changed by creating the illusion that it hasn't.

cro/Reuters/AP




Next 5 >>